In Crash on Demand, David Holmgren not only updates Future Scenarios (2007) work but also builds on his essay Money vs Fossil Energy: The battle for control of the world (2009), as a running commentary on the rapid changes in the big picture context for permaculture activism, especially in the Australian context. It assumes understanding of these previous works and, of course permaculture. ‘Preaching to the choir’ it may be, but hopefully it contributes new perspectives to keep permaculture activists ahead of the game.
Permaculture teaching and activism have always aimed to work with those already interested in changing their lives, land and communities for the better, rather than proselytising the disinterested majority. Over many decades, idealistic youth have responded positively to the ‘can-do’, personal empowerment of permaculture design, but it has also attracted more experienced citizens disillusioned with top down mainstream environmentalism’s failure to stop the juggernaut of consumer capitalism. Similarly, disillusioned social and political activists are just starting to recognise permaculture as a potentially effective pathway for societal change as 20th century style mass movements seem to have lost their potency.
David’s argument is essentially that radical, but achievable, behaviour change from dependent consumers to responsible self-reliant producers (by some relatively small minority of the global middle class) has a chance of stopping the juggernaut of consumer capitalism from driving the world over the climate change cliff. It maybe a slim chance, but a better bet than current herculean efforts to get the elites to pull the right policy levers; whether by sweet promises of green tech profits or alternatively threats from mass movements shouting for less consumption.
Download the French translation by Sébastien Marot.
A Spanish translation (by Silvia Di Blasio, Daniel Mendez and Hernán Del Vecchio): Colapso por Encargo.
In Turkish (translated by Suat Ertüzün): Kahverengi Teknoloji Çağı’na Hoş Geldiniz.
See the discussion this essay has created.
See also the interviews and a summary.
Also available:
Future Scenarios: How communities can adapt to Peak Oil and Climate Change – the book
In it David outlines four scenarios that bring to life the likely cultural, political, agricultural, and economic implications of peak oil and climate change, and the generations-long era of “energy descent” that faces us.
69 thoughts on “Crash on Demand: Welcome to the Brown Tech Future”
Pingback: Crash on Demand: David Holmgren updates his Future Scenarios « integral permaculture
After Denmark, Warsaw and, soon, Paris conferences, I am totally convinced that there is no hope to stop the coming collapse. Having said this, I see permaculture as the best way to shorten the interregnum of collapse and provide a sustainable, respectful way to recover coming out on the “other side”. In the meantime, I am digging ponds on my 10 acres, building my infrastructure, and helping build a local,sustainable community.
I can see you are employed in valuable change making enterprises
None the less here is my meager question
Hello
I’ve recently seen the Permaculutre Doc directed by Donna Read.
I am curious to know whether Mr Holmgran might have been traveling by greyhound bus in western Canada ( Banf) in wither 1978, I recall meeting an Aussie , that had a resemblance to the the chap in the documentary…. duringa trip with my son, where we took a side trip to see Lake Louise…. (?)
No, my first and only trip to North America was in 2005
Pingback: Crash on Demand | Damn the Matrix
Pingback: Transition Scales Up for 2014 | The Harbinger
A couple of quick comments on your new essay.
1) the criticism of the US (and soon to be world) shale oil boom (note 4 in the essay) was not by a qualified person, and has already been shown to be inaccurate. It is a fact that many shales are full of hydrocarbons, and that the development of the technology required a lot of searching the ‘adjacent possible’ (see the book “where good ideas come from) by a several oil independents (see “The Frackers” book), and this was an expensive and risky business….essentially only undertaken due to desperation (which seems to be a capitalist phenomenon more than government one). It is also a fact that up to 50% of the rock in any particular geologic basin (see the wiki articles) are shales (vs. sandstone, etc.) The amount of rock in all of the world’s basins is massive. The important point here is that horizontal + fracked wells are very expensive, and require high oil/gas prices to pay for them. “High” is relative, but if the oil is there and worth $200/bbl, it doesn’t take a very efficient well to pay for that. So it is highly likely that oil produced from horizontal + fracked wells will be limited by the price of the oil (and not much else), that is until this technology has been fully deployed… possibly many trillions of dollars from now. I was trained as a petroleum engineer in the early 1980s and was somewhat surprised by these developments, based on what I was taught and saw in the 1980s and 1990s, but I know better than to argue with demonstrations in the field with arguments based on theory and stories from old text books. I have seen enough to not love the oil business, but I have learned to accept that there a lot of people that are clever, highly motivated, willing to take risks, and can see things that I can’t, given where they are in the ‘adjacent possible’… and their lack of interest in sharing their knowledge with the likes of me.
2) The above point has no force except in relation to time. Nothing is different but the number of years it will take to get past the ‘fossil fuel era’. This is manifest. But it is also possible/probably that many clever, highly motivated people with be able to come up with things unforeseen in our ‘planner’s droop’ oriented philosophy. Have a look at the many variants on fusion being pursued, from polywell and it’s kin to good-ol LENR. Failing success in one of these high-risk ventures, and given where I live in New Mexico, USA, where there is almost as much sunshine as in Australia, I am pretty sure that solar panels can go a long way to a stable energy consumption picture, at least everywhere that is not dramatically energetically overpopulated (see the David MacKay TED talk) such as the UK and most of the rest of Europe. The simple reason is that energetically, solar panels are a positive energy return item, i.e they return 4-5 times their energy investment. (See the “Do the Math” blog for more). There is no reason to believe that they will not continue to be built in large numbers until something better has come along…. the solar panel technology is easy and well understood. It’s not going anywhere. At worst, we will have to rearrange our consumption to better fit the 5 hours of high solar power availability, and a lot of people will have to move to the desert, but this assumes failure to develop liquid batteries (see the TED talk by Donald Sadoway). This is far from a full-on descent scenario.
As far as your politics goes, try reading “The Righteous Mind” to better understand the range of political ‘tastes’ and conservative institutions such as property ownership and where they come from. It never hurts to be informed… it’s what you don’t know that hurts you. I am sympathetic with people who are afraid of the future and want to be prepared…. this is the only strategy worth considering, given our lack of advancement over the ant and the grasshopper in the old tale.
Pingback: The 5 factors that will enable Transition to scale up | VantageWire
Pingback: Another Week of Climate Disruption News, January 5, 2014 – A Few Things Ill Considered
Nicole Foss has published a follow up response to “Crash on Demand” at her automaticearth website, titled “Crash on Demand? – A Response to David Holmgren”.
http://www.theautomaticearth.com/crash-demand-response-david-holmgren-3/
Transition founder Rob Hopkins has published his critique on “Crash on Demand” on his Transition culture website.
http://www.transitionnetwork.org/blogs/rob-hopkins/2014-01/holmgren-s-crash-demand-be-careful-what-you-wish
Albert Bates (optimistic collapsenik) charted a number of well known “collapseniks” including David Holmgren.
peaksurfer.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/charting-collapseniks.html
Pingback: Radical Homestead Recommended Reading – Crash on Demand? A Response to David Holmgren - Radical Homestead
Pingback: Climate Change is a Crime ~ The Art of Fooling Ourselves | Silvia Di Blasio
Pingback: Re-Think Everything ~ And Know the Place for the First Time | Silvia Di Blasio
Pingback: Re-Think Everything ~ And Know the Place for the First Time | Living As If Others Really Mattered
Pingback: David Holmgren 2011 Interview: Strategies for the Transition « integral permaculture
Pingback: What is David Holmgren Really Telling Us? « integral permaculture
Pingback: Emphasizing the Wrong “E” | Living As If Others Really Mattered
Pingback: Sustainability and collapse – two debates | Peak Oil India
Pingback: Crash on Demand: radio interview (1) » Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Tune in to hear what Holmgren got to say.
http://holmgren.com.au/crash-demand-radio-interview-1/
Dear David Holmgren,
Whether a problem can be solved–or whether it’s even worth solving–often depends on how you define the problem.
So, “thank you.” One way our global “problem” can be defined, is by individual suffering and happiness, and your work has helped me to personally transcend a great deal of suffering to find happiness and contentment. Most obviously, you have helped me to start building my own beautiful, resilient, low-impact way of life, with a rewarding connection to nature that I couldn’t have imagined 10 years ago. But your Permaculture Principles have also helped me to reconnect to my career as a classical musician in a way that turned burn out (literally, personal energy depletion) into regenerative activity.
I try to be “worthy” of that “solution” by paying it forward.
No matter what the future brings, this “problem” will continue to be worth the attention of Permaculturists.
——————-
I greatly appreciate your approach in COD. From a “dissensus” strategic stand, I think there are many people who feel dis-engaged by thoughts of hopelessness who may be re-energized by a “resistance ethos.”
As nature solves its problems through “random lateral exploration,” we may need to beware of a Permaculture that has become just another part of the status quo. While it’s good that Permaculture can reach out to “mainstream” constituencies, some part of Permaculture needs to be positioned to attract a next-generation counter culture, as these natural social critics are always the engine of real social change and innovation. And they are the most likely to act upon Permaculture in meaningful ways that will create truly valuable models for the future, as opposed to the conservative farmer in my county who “practices Permaculture” because he uses mulch whenever he can. THAT is a “Permaculture” that’s ready for its long sleep in the compost heap.
———————-
Other than suffering/happiness, I have yet to find other ways of “defining” our global predicament that call me to action. Many of the battles I would have fought are already lost: to use oil wealth to address social inequality and suffering, to transition to “Green Tech,” to save the self-regulating emergent quality I experience in my biome and our world ecosystem, to prevent the Anthropocene Mass Extinction Event, to prevent the irradiation of the Northern Hemisphere…. If you aren’t familiar with Paul Kingsnorth’s infamous “Dark Ecology” essay I suspect that you may find some spiritual resonance here:
https://www.orionmagazine.org/article/dark-ecology/
I see that I am the “problem,” when I define the “problem” as I did above. It is just my own ability to accept inevitable change as the world adapts to its most headstrong children.
But each person, each ecosystem, each being… these are true victories to be had.
Ah, I just realized that we “value the marginal” when we appeal to the “edges” of society, rather than its narrow “mainstream.” Yes, that “edge” is the most productive part indeed.
Pingback: David Holmgren Responds to “Crash on Demand” Discussion « integral permaculture
Pingback: The Best Way to Address Climate Change is NOT to Talk About it | The Overthinker
Pingback: A Bargain with the Archdruid | VantageWire
Pingback: World's Biggest Green Drinks, this Fri in Ballarat » Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: A Bargain with the Archdruid | Bill Totten's Weblog
Pingback: Crash on Demand: radio interview (2) » Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: Crash on Demand: Pathways | VantageWire
Pingback: Crash on Demand: radio interview (3) » Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: Podcast of the day/C-Realm: David Holmgren on Psycho-social Debt Jubilee | PDX Currency Corporation
Pingback: Väikkärisuunnitelmaa, kumppanuuksia ja tulevaisuuksia | Sinnikästä tuotantoa
Pingback: Permaculture magazine » Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: P2P Foundation's blog » Blog Archive » What is David Holmgren really saying?
Pingback: What is David Holmgren really saying? | PDX Currency Corporation
Pingback: Crash on Demand: Welcome to the Brown Tech Future
Pingback: Permaculture Teachers Training at O.U.R. Ecovillage ~ Silvia’s Experience | Living As If Others Really Mattered
Pingback: Permaculture Teachers Training at O.U.R. Ecovillage ~ Silvia’s Experience | Silvia Di Blasio
Pingback: P2P Foundation's blog » Blog Archive » Podcast of the day/C-Realm: David Holmgren on Psycho-social Debt Jubilee
Pingback: Walk Out Walk On | Living As If Others Really Mattered
Pingback: Follow Up on COD ~ And Why it is Worth to Continue the Discussion | Living As If Others Really Mattered
Pingback: Crash on Demand, the discussion so far » Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: Permaculture ~ Another Way is Possible ~ A Celebration of Life | Living As If Others Really Mattered
Pingback: Taking Permaculture to the Next Level | Silvia Di Blasio
Pingback: Taking Permaculture to the Next Level | Living As If Others Really Mattered
Pingback: Colapso por encargo » Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: Teaching Permaculture: What is Permaculture For | Mainstream Permaculture
Pingback: Call to Action: Reclaim the Climate Movement | The Overthinker
Pingback: Dinosaur Economics and the Brown Tech World The 4th Wave
Pingback: Episode #150: Crash on Demand | The Agroinnovations Podcast
I think it’s very unlikely that we will plan our way out of the predicament we’re in. People just aren’t like that. We generally respond to events and situations that have already arrived, not ones that might happen at some unspecified future date if we don’t change our ways today. In any case I don’t think there’s any possibility of a ‘soft landing’ on a planet with 7 billion people, half of whom live in cities, which are almost the definition of unsustainability. We know that there are ways to lead a much more self-sufficient and sustainable life than the typical ‘first world’ person enjoys today, but that requires access to a significant area of land for producing food and materials. Permaculture and low-impact living are a great way for individuals to improve their own resilience and self-reliance but billions of people have no chance of choosing this path because they have no land. Since we’re in overshoot, I assume that the population will decline due to conflict, famine, disease etc. – the factors that have kept population in check for many thousands of years. All I can really do is try to plan ahead for myself and my family.
Pingback: Wellhead and Tailpipe / Carol’s Question | Mainstream Permaculture
Pingback: To collapse or not to collapse - Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: Great Debate
Pingback: Shades of Green(Lifestyle) Awards Reflection - Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: Permaculture activism in the Brown Tech Future - Holmgren Permaculture Design for Sustainable Living
Pingback: permaculture | The grokking eagle
Pingback: Permaculture | υγεία
Pingback: Sustainability and Collapse – Two Debates | Resilience india
Pingback: Dinosaur economics and the brown tech world | Adventures in Permaculture
Pingback: What I’m reading and watching… | Our Great Transiton
Pingback: Sustainability and Collapse – Two Debates | Ecologise
Pingback: Call to Action: Reclaim the Climate Movement | SHIFT magazine
Pingback: The Climate Games – Beyond COP21 | Mainstream Permaculture
Pingback: Call to Action: Reclaim the Climate Movement – A Deeper Shade of Green
Pingback: My Homepage
It’s an awesome post designed for all the online visitors; they
will get benefit from it I am sure.